30
Oct
I am voting against Proposition A.

The law would repeal loss limits at casinos, which would cause already desperate people to lose even more of their money. Seriously – I think a $500 every two hour limit is fine for most folks. You want more, go to Vegas. 

The law also restricts the number of casinos in the state to the number already built/being built. I don’t see how this benefits anyone other than the big casinos already in business.

As for generating money for schools, Kansas City would see none of it. In fact…

“The Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education released a study in early October saying that if Proposition A passes, it will not provide funding for Missouri’s largest school districts, and about one-quarter of Missouri’s public school students attend class in districts that are projected to get nothing next year from the ballot measure.” – from http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/M … on_A_(2008).

Overall, I just don’t think it’s a good idea to allow people to gamble away their life-savings so some rural schools can get what amounts to about 2% more per year in funding.

By the way – see all Missouri ballot initiatives here: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/M … t_measures

I’m thinking NO on Amendment 1, making English the official language of all governmental meetings. This is already the case – we don’t need a constitutional amendment for it.

I’ll probably vote YES on Amendment 4 regarding water control. While I don’t necessarily like that there are no specifics as to how newly non-restricted funds would be distributed, it looks like it wouldn’t be so bad to allow for increased funding for sewer projects.

Prop A – See above.

Prop B – Missouri Homecare Council – sounds good to me. Let homecare workers unionize.

Prop C – Clean Energy Initiative – If it is approved by voters, it will create a renewable electricity standard in the state. The standard would require utility companies to gradually increase their usage of renewable energy annually until 15 percent of the energy used in the state is renewable. The initiative would also require that energy rates not increase by more than one percent annually. Sounds like a YES to me.

Five more days…

3 Responses to “Full disclosure.”

Thanks for the NO vote.

That’s my vote, too, but my reasons are more philosophical than ledger sheet.

To wit:

Loss limits are nanny state baby sitting for adults. If these morons are stupid enough to gamble away their kids lunch money or their retirement funds; it’s a free country.

So that’s no reason for me.

Same for building more casinos. We regulate permits for gas stations, grocery markets, and liquor stores, so if the zoning says ‘commercial’, and as long as gambling is legal – build a casino.

So that’s no reason for me.

What I do object to is giving over-bureaucratized, marginally efficient with dubious results, gub’mint run monopolies any more money. Too many gub’mint schools are failing, and too many of their malignantly unionized personnel unfit for their jobs which leave parents – the tax payers – the ones paying the bills – little recourse.

It’s time for new options & new resources – like vouchers for private schools, if so desired. Parents are the best advocate for their child’s educational needs.

So, until ‘spreading the wealth around’ is considered (Right, O-Man?), no more money for gub’mint schools!

School vouchers, YES. Prop A, NO.

VOTE SCHOOL VOUCHERS – VOTE SCHOOL CHOICE.

After all. Who could be opposed to choice?
(besides the malignant gub’mint school unions)

October 30th, 2008

Thanks for your summary of the issues and the link to the website with information on the ballot issues. I knew there were several issues to vote on and I spent a while trying to find a website with information, to no avail.

Lori
October 31st, 2008

Thanks for the comments!

October 31st, 2008